staircase - Insights - banner - 1900 x 500

“Large proprietary companies” to double in size

Rohan Harris, Andrew Parlour, Rory Maguire

The thresholds for determining whether a proprietary company is considered “large” will double from 1 July 2019, reducing the compliance burden of companies that no longer fit this category (including financial reporting requirements and the need to have a whistleblower policy). Accordingly, existing “large” proprietary companies should review whether they will remain in this category.

Details of the new criteria

Following the commencement of the Corporations Amendment (Proprietary Company Thresholds) Regulations 2019 (Regulations), the criteria under the Corporations Act 2001 (Act) for determining how a proprietary company is considered “large” will double.  As a result of the change, it is anticipated that approximately one-third of existing “large” proprietary companies will re-classified as “small” from 1 July 2019.

Under the new criteria if, within a financial year, a company satisfies at least two of the following criteria, it will be considered “large”:

Before 1 July 2019

After 1 July 2019

The consolidated revenue for the financial year of the company and the entities it may control is:

$25 million

$50 million

The value of the consolidated gross assets at the end of the financial year of the company and the entities it may control is:

$12.5 million

$25 million

The company and the entities it may control has the following number of employees at the end of the financial year:

50

100

 

Financial reporting obligations

Each year, “large” proprietary companies are required to prepare and lodge with ASIC an audited financial report, director’s report and auditor’s report.  Accordingly, companies that are no longer “large” are not required to do this (though they must continue to keep sufficient financial records).

Whistleblower policies

Under the new whistleblower regime, “large” proprietary companies are required to prepare and publish a written whistleblower policy (by 1 January 2020).  Accordingly, this requirement will not apply to companies that are no longer “large”.  For further information on the new whistleblower regime, please see here.

What to do next?

We recommend that all current “large” companies closely review whether, from 1 July 2019, they may now be “small” and accordingly make the most of the reduction in compliance obligations and associated costs.

Please contact Rohan Harris, Andrew Parlour or Rory Maguire from our Corporate & Commercial Advisory team should you require further information or advice in relation to corporate structure or compliance matters.

If you’d like to stay up to date with our Corporate & Commercial Alerts, please sign up here.

View related insights

C and C Alert 15 April 360 x 240

ASIC brings first action against a director for failing to have a DIN

15 Apr 2024

On 19 March 2024, ASIC commenced the first prosecution against a director for failing to comply with the obligations to have a DIN. A director appeared in the Downing Centre Local Court and was formal ...

View
nurse-sitting-and-bonding-with-her-senior-picture-360x240

The meaning of ‘governing body’

17 Oct 2023

In a raft of reforms to the responsibilities of approved providers of aged care related to governance which commenced in December 2022, the term ‘governing body’ was inserted into the Aged ...

View
male-customer-reading-loan-contract-bank-employee-holding-money-mortgage 540x360

Are you ready for changes to Australia’s unfair contract terms regime?

12 Oct 2023

From 9 November 2023, Australia’s unfair contract terms regime is changing. The changes include expanding the unfair contract terms regime to ‘small businesses’ that have fewer than ...

View