Retired couple

NSW Retirement Villages – Proposed reforms to exit entitlement timeframe and recurrent charges cap

Donna Rayner, Rosemary Southgate, Julian Peters and Rebecca Turner

The NSW Government has released its discussion paper on proposed reforms to exit entitlements and a cap on recurrent charges in line with its election commitment to do so. You can find the paper here.

The purpose of the discussion paper is to seek feedback from the retirement village sector about the proposed reforms. Submissions on the discussion paper close at 5 pm on 16 August 2019.

The proposed reforms seek to remove any distinction between registered interest holders and non-registered interest holders in the context of exit entitlement payment timeframes and liability for recurrent charges after the resident permanently vacates. 

Exit Entitlement Payment Timeframe

At present

  • For residents who are registered interest holders, unless their contract provides for earlier payment, the retirement village operator must pay the resident their exit entitlement within 14 days of the earliest of:

(a) the date their unit is sold;

(b)the date the operator enters into a contract with a new resident or tenant of the premises; and

(c)the date a person takes up residence in the premises with the consent of the operator.

  • For residents who are non-registered interest holders, the retirement village operator must pay the resident their exit entitlement within a maximum period of 6 months after the resident provides vacant possession of the premises. 

Proposed Reform

If implemented, the proposed reform will require village operators to pay residents their exit entitlement within a maximum period of:

  • For metropolitan areas - 6 months from the date the resident provides vacant possession of the premises; and
  • For regional areas – 12 months from the date the resident provides vacant possession of the premises.

This proposed reform will place registered interest holders (including freehold, strata, community and company title residents) in the same position as non-registered interest holders in terms of the exit entitlement payment timeframe. Also of importance, is the Government’s proposed “metropolitan area” which will include the Blue Mountains, Hawkesbury, Wollondilly and the Central Coast council areas.

The discussion paper also proposes that a form of independent valuation process be adopted for the purpose of determining the value of the exit entitlement at the time the payment is due, and that there be consideration of an “opt out” process for residents.

The proposed change to the exit entitlement payment timeframe is likely to have significant consequences for both residents and operators as it will remove the opportunity for industry innovation and is likely to adversely affect the liquidity of operators, debt financing for developing villages, sale prices of units and investment in the industry. The requirement for a valuation is also likely to significantly increase the cost to operators and residents to undertake the resale process. The opt in/opt out process will also increase the complexity, administration and costs for operators and residents.

Recurrent charges

At present

Registered interest holders and non-registered interest holders are required to pay recurrent charges for general services for 42 days after they permanently vacate the premises. For registered interest holders, liability for recurrent charges ceases at the end of this period. However, registered interest holders must still pay a share (equal to their potential share of capital gain) of recurrent charges for general services until the premises are sold or a new resident enters into a contract for the premises.

Proposed reform

The proposed reform will align liability for payment of recurrent charges for general services for registered interest holders with non-registered interest holders. This means that liability for payment of recurrent charges for general services for both types of interest holders will cease 42 days after the resident permanently vacates the premises.

Again, this will significantly increase the cost to operators of resales as they will bear the liability for recurrent charges for vacant units until the resale occurs.

If you want to have your say about the proposed reforms, your submission must be made by 16 August 2019 and can be submitted by completing the Fair Trading Department’s online form or emailing them at: rvdiscussionpaper@finance.nsw.gov.au

For more information

Please contact Donna Rayner, Rosemary Southgate, Julian Peters or Rebecca Turner from our expert Retirement Living team should you require further information or advice.

If you would like to keep in touch with alerts and insights from our expert Retirement Living team, you can subscribe to our mailing list here.

View related insights

Assisted-Dying-Aged-Care---Insights---thumbnail---360-x-240

“Please do not give me CPR”: ‘Do Not Resuscitate’ requests in retirement living

6 Sep 2019

Retirement village operators are receiving an increasing number of ‘Do Not Resuscitate’ (‘DNR’) requ ...

View
Aged-Care-Bulletin-360-x-240-thumb

Aged Care Bulletin 29 August 2019

29 Aug 2019

The latest insights from our award winning Aged Care legal team.

View
Businesswoman-at-desk---Insights---thumbnail

Voluntary Assisted Dying: What do Retirement Village Operators need to know?

27 Aug 2019

The media recently reported that the first person in Victoria has passed away using the voluntary as ...

View