Construction - Insights - banner 1900 x 500

Buyers of New Homes to pay GST to ATO

The Treasury Laws Amendment (2018 Measures No.1) Bill is due to commence on 1 July 2018 which provides Purchasers of new residential premises or long term Leases of those premises from Developers will be required to deduct GST from the settlement monies when settling the purchase and forward the GST amount to the Australian Taxation Office (ATO).

If the Margin Scheme is not used by the vendor Developer, 1/11th of the Contract price or the price of the supply is required to be sent to the ATO. If the Margin Scheme is used by the Vendor Developer then 7% of the Contract price or supply price will be required to be sent to the ATO unless the Minister administering the Act determines a percentage between 7% to 9%.

If there is a sale to an associate of an owner Developer without consideration or for consideration that is less than the “GST inclusive Market Value”, the amount to be paid to the ATO is an amount equal to 10 percent of the “GST inclusive Market Value”.

A vendor Developer must not make a supply by way of sale or long term Lease of residential premises or potential residential land unless when making a supply, they have given to the other entity a written notice setting out particulars which are detailed in the GST Act.

The notice disclosure must be included in the Contract for Sale or long term Lease.

For Contracts entered into prior to 1 July 2018 these provisions do not apply until 1 July 2020, but for Contracts entered into after 1 July 2018 these provisions apply and effectively mean that buyers of new homes are to pay GST to the ATO.

Should you have any queries regarding the circumstances of these new laws do not hesitate to contact Julian Peters of Russell Kennedy.

View related insights

miniature house and calculator with two business people

More than just the purchase price: SRO issues guidance on dutiable value in Victorian property transactions

9 Sep 2026

The Victorian State Revenue Office has clarified that payments made by a purchaser towards certain vendor tax liabilities can constitute dutiable consideration, expanding the scope of amounts subject ...

View
RK Developers Insight Banner

The Legal Landscape: RK's Insights for Developers | Edition 1

7 Jul 2026

Welcome to the inaugural edition of The Legal Landscape: RK’s Insights for Developers, a newsletter we will be regularly publishing covering legal and regulatory matters relating to property dev ...

View
Property Restrictive Covenants 360 x 240

How secure is the benefit of a restrictive covenant? Apparently, not as secure as you might think...

21 May 2026

In Jayasinghe v Perry, the Supreme Court of Victoria held that a beneficiary’s prolonged inaction in response to an obvious breach of a restrictive covenant can amount to implied acquiescence, s ...

View