If you’ve been following recent news about Healthscope, you may be curious to know how the company’s potential transformation from private equity ownership to a not-for-profit (NFP) entity could be legally possible.
This is my attempt to explain it in simple terms.
There are three related structural factors that could make it happen.
1. Insolvency created the conditions for structural change
Healthscope carries significant debt. When its private equity owners withdrew support, the company was placed into the hands of receivers appointed by Healthscope’s lenders.
Why does this matter? Receivership allows lenders (via the receiver) to choose a restructuring model that they believe will maximise value, as well as managing their exposure risk.
2. The Executive Team proposed a “For Purpose” (NFP) bid
The Healthscope CEO and executive team led a bid to acquire and operate Healthscope as a charitable, care‑focused not‑for‑profit organisation. The model requires reinvesting all surpluses back into hospital operations and operating under a formally recognised charitable status and purpose.
3. Financial Sustainability
The lenders are evidently convinced that the business could be financially sustainable under a NFP structure. The NFP model would eliminate specific tax liabilities, including payroll tax and income tax on any future profits. It would also enable access to fringe benefits tax concessions to offer benefits to employees.
The viability of the NFP model also assumes that lower rents will be secured with Healthscope’s landlords. That remains a big assumption based on current media reports, and the prospect of landlords teaming up with other potential hospital operators for a rival bid.
So what happens next?
To complete the transition, the new “For Purpose” company must secure charitable status from the Australian Charities and Not‑for‑profits Commission (ACNC) and NFP tax recognition from the Australian Taxation Office (ATO). Both of these approvals will require detailed applications and submissions, including:
- Proving that it has exclusively charitable purposes.
- Being not‑for‑profit in its structure and operations.
- Meeting ACNC governance and record‑keeping standards.
- Complying with ongoing reporting requirements, including annual statements.
- Meeting ATO requirements for accessing tax concessions once ACNC‑registered.
None of this is a given, but there is a public policy imperative to ensure the hospitals remain open and jobs are secured.
Could others follow suit?
The financial pressures being experienced by organisations in the health, aged and disability care, and broader community service sectors are well-documented. Whilst NFP organisations are not immune from these pressures, the tax advantages are significant and can be the difference between financial sustainability and failure.
Given the current economic environment, it would not be surprising to see similar structuring proposals put forward in an attempt to rescue other struggling businesses.
If you’re looking for advice about NFP structures, or for assistance with any other aspects of business structuring and ownership, please contact Principals Rohan Harris, Jonathan Teh, Kate Littlewood or one of our Corporate & Commercial Advisory experts.
If you would like to stay up to date with Alerts, news, and insights from our team, you can subscribe to our mailing list here.